Friday, April 12, 2013

Effective Slide and Screen Design




“Design is the method of putting form and content together. Design, just as art, has multiple definitions; there is no single definition. Design can be art. Desgin can be aesthetics. Design is so simple, that’s why it is so complicated.”-Paul Rand 

More than 30 million PowerPoint presentations are made on a daily basis (Weinstein, 2011). When designing presentations and its slides, its important to not only use vital design principles, but to also think of the target audience to whom you will be presenting.

Szabo and Kanuka’s (1999) study on screen design and its effects on recall learning, study time, and completion rates yielded interesting results. Their study found that good screen design did not affect achievement. They did find, however, that poor use of the design principles resulted in more instructional time. Therefore, using the principle desgins when designing slides is important when there is a concern about “minimizing learning time and maximizing learner completion rates” (p. 39).

Levy and Yupangco (2008) discusses the importance of color and the five design principles designers need to think about when designing effective slides. Those five principles include balance, proportion, dominance, rhythm, and unity. Other principles include C.R.A.P., simplicity, perspective, and layout. What other principles can you think of that are vital to slide/screen design?

I thought the most interesting article we were assigned in our learning unit was Simon’s (2004) Does PowerPoint make you stupid? Simon does a good job of pointing out Tafte’s ineffectiveness of making a valid argument about PowerPoint. This goes along with our discussion in class and how Dr. Wilcox brought up that it is not the software itself that makes a project ineffective, but how well the designer uses his or her resources and design principles to create that project. It is also interesting to note the year in which this article was published, in 2004. People were already questioning the effectiveness of PowerPoint, and yet nine years later we are still using it! 

Here are some useful sites on color to help you with creating your slide set
Bringing this one back again- we have already worked with it.

This website has its own list of several online color resources for designers.

http://www.smashingapps.com/2011/05/24/45-color-tools-and-resources-for-choosing-the-best-color-palette-for-your-designs.html. This website may be especially useful to you while designing your slides. This site has color tools on the website to help you design and pick out your color palette for your slides.

Finally, here is a YouTube video that includes useful tips and guidelines to creating an effective presentation



Questions
  1. Although we have discussed that it is the designer who makes the slides/project effective or ineffective, what are your thoughts on PowerPoint? Is there a “better” program to use? Do you prefer to use any other program besides PowerPoint to design slides? Why or why not?
  2. Are there any other design principles you think are especially important to use when designing slides, outside of the five principles mentioned above?
  3. What are elements of a slideshow that you find effective and that gain your attention?


References 
Levy, S., & Yupangco, J. (2008). A picture is worth 1000 words: Visual design in e-learning. The ELearning Guild, 1-8.

Simons, T. (2004).  Does PowerPoint make you look stupid? Presentations.com, 1-6.

Szabo, M., & Kanuka, H. (1999). Effects of violating screen design principles of balance, unity, and focus on recall learning, study time, and completion rates. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8(1), 23-42.

Weinstein, H. (2011). Epidemic PwoerPoint misuse. The Associated General Contractors of America.

http://blog.intelligent.ly/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Slide19-300x225.jpg

4 comments:

  1. PowerPoint was always the program that you used when you had to present something. I can remember teachers in high school placing an emphasis on the animation features and the sounds that you could incorporate into presentations. I felt like teachers were looking at those features more then the content that was being presented. Ever since that life changing time in my life I haven't been a huge fan of PowerPoint, but then again I felt like there weren't too many other options. Prezi has become my presentation tool of choice recently. When I compare PowerPoint to Prezi I don't think I could tell you significant differences between the two, except that PowerPoint seems "standard", and Prezi is more "out of the box". Prezi allows you to present information similar to PowerPoint, however it starts with the overall picture giving a concept map feel to it. Thoughts can be broken off into their own little bubbles and the flow of the presentation can be "re-mapped" with ease.

    Color is something that comes to mind as something I would consider when designing slides. It is good to hear (on the YouTube video) the amount of information that should be on a slide and the length of time that can be spend and still hold the audience's attention.

    Without photography or images on a slideshow it is difficult for me to stay focused throughout the presentation. Before taking this class, I would have never paid attention/incorporated these elements in my own presentations. This is something that will catch my attention as I critique other presentations.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that it’s interesting when people see a bad product and immediately jump to criticizing the tool that was used to make it, rather than those who used the tools to make it. But what about how and when it’s used? I’m sure we would all agree from conversations we’ve had in the past that oftentimes people use powerpoint for instruction when really another instructional delivery method is much more appropriate. I think many have come to over-rely upon ppt as an instructional tool, when really it is only warranted in certain learning situations, for a brief period of time, and as a supplemental delivery format. While Prezi is a really neat alternative to PowerPoint, I’d imagine that the novelty hype surrounding it right now was similar to the hype that surrounded PowerPoint when it first was released. Don’t get me wrong, Prezi does offer capabilities that ppt doesn’t, which makes it a great tool in certain situations.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I use PowerPoint for some things but I far prefer Prezi and Camtasia. Prezi allows for a larger picture when all is said and done but I will often use Camtasia to go from site to site in a lecture when I post one online. One thing I don't like is when slides look the same over and over. IN that case repetition is misused! Things that gain my attention are the use of color and action.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As a student, and especially in this program - there have been plenty of opportunities to practice with different software in order to create effective presentations. While I like Prezi for its ability to highlight relationships through movement, I think PowerPoint's ease of use and practical slide template designs will continue to make it the most used presentation software. Design doesnt have to be repetitive throughout - I agree with Tassie it can become a misuse of the principal of repetition, but thats another area where the designer comes into play. Rather than use a template, if the designer is using creative and dynamic design principals, then effective presentations can be created using PPT.

    ReplyDelete