Friday, February 19, 2010

Expanding the concept of Literacy


Elizabeth Daley
EDUCAUSE review. March/April 2003. pp 33 - 40.

What is your definition of “literacy”? I, like a majority of people would say, the ability to read and write, for that is the definition I grew up with. But what about media literacy? Is that different from “literacy”?
Elizabeth Daley’s article, Expanding the Concept of Literacy, suggests four arguments for an expanded definition of literacy:
1 – The multimedia language of the screen has become the current vernacular.
2 – The multimedia language of the screen is capable of constructing complex meanings independent of text.
3 – The multimedia language of the screen enables modes of thought, ways of communicating and conducting research, and methods of publication and teaching that are essentially different from those of text.
4 – Lastly, following from the previous three arguments, those who are truly literate in the twenty-first century will be those who learn to both read and write the multimedia language of the screen.

http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0322.pdf

I want to concentrate mostly on argument #4, but also want to highlight a few phrases from the first three; phrases I feel are the highlights of each section.
#1 - “Metaphors from the screen have become common in every aspect of daily conversations. Close-up is synonymous for “in-depth” and “penetrating.” We speak of flashing back to our earlier lives. We frame events to put them in context. We cut to the chase when we are in a hurry.”

#2 - “The author, a respected art historian, asserted that it was time for the academy to give up a deeply ingrained suspicion of images and realize that the visual could indeed contain intellectual content…”
“Like text, multimedia can enable us to develop concepts and abstractions, comparison and metaphors, while at the same time engaging our emotional and aesthetics sensibilities.”
“Think also for a moment of historic cinematic moments: the first moon landing; the planes slamming into the World Trade Center. What would it be like to try to fully share these and other momentous events without access to the language and power of the screen?”

#3 - “Accepting the language of multimedia as co-equal with text will require a major paradigm shift that challenges the domination of science and rationality, abstraction and theory.”
“Interactivity as a core factor in multimedia is in some ways closely related to performance and can enable the viewer/reader/user to participate directly in the construction of meaning.”

#4 – “Even with this history and ample evidence of the skill required to construct media, the attitude widely help by both faculty and administration is that complex media texts do not deserve classroom or research time, especially if such study might take emphasis away from traditional activities such as essays and research papers.”
“No doubt, young people today have less fear of the computer and more technical ability with software for rich media; multimedia is needed in their everyday language. However, they have no more critical ability with this language as do their elders – perhaps less. They need to be taught to write for the screen and analyze multimedia just as much as, if not more than, they need to be taught to write and analyze any specific genre in text”

My question to you:
Do you think a “beginners” multimedia class should be included in the freshman or sophomore required classes, no matter what the major might be? When you were an undergrad, did you wish you had known more about the multimedia world? Did you need it as an undergrad?
Would you have taken a multimedia crash course the summer before you started your Master’s program if it had been offered? If it was online? What if it was required?

Personally I would have loved a crash course in the basic multimedia software I have used during my two years in this program – both AHRD and Ed Tech. It is very frustrating for me to stumble my way through assignments and yet not have the real time to sit down and discover the functions on my own. When school is out, that is when I have my free time. And you can be assured I will be playing with all of the software I can to gain the confidence I need going into my last year of the Ed Tech program!

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

The Whole of Gestalt



Saturday, February 13, 2010

Gestalt: The Whole Part
In this picture we tend to see a triangle and a sqaure instead of unregular figures
http://www.uic.edu/classes/psych/psych352jw/c4.html
The fundamental principle of gestalt perception is the law of prägnanz.
"The law of Pragnanz says that we try to experience things in as good a gestalt way as possible. In this sense, "good" can mean several things, such as regular, orderly, simplistic, symmetrical, etc." [Grika,2005]. We see this everyday in particular with advertising in logo's and signs that may be incomplete yet can catch our eye as unusual. However, we quickly can see the whole picture because our mind wants to create order to the incomplete image.
An example in advertising of this phenonenom is the logo for Federal Express: At first we tend to see the words but then hidden between the letters E and x is the arrow indicating delivery. We see it but then tend to go back to what may seem simpler and more complete. It is somewhat perceived yet moves on to the name of the organization. Again, Gestalt is about the relationship of parts to the whole.
How do you see this law as important to instruction when designing materials that capture the whole concept in many parts? Why is it important for businesses when creating an image?



Posted by John at 1:52 PM 0 comments
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Monday, February 15, 2010

Directing the Eye with Color, Shape, and Photos in Multimedia







Although you have been asked to post to our blog and respond to your peers postings, much of your instruction this semester will occur through postings I make to our blog. Please carefully read what I post and access all of the links as they will contain content and examples NOT covered in our books.

When individuals undergo training in the visual arts, they begin their education by looking at the elements of design - layout, shape, color, line, contrast - and how they affect the viewer's perception. Design students are trained to use the tools of their trade to communicate visually in much the same way that prospective authors are trained to use words to communicate in writing. Despite their training in the formal elements of art making, much of the artist's education happens in the real world by observing people, events, and places. This week, we are going to examine the work of Romare Bearden, an American artist who lived and worked in Harlem.

Bearden worked in a variety of media - printmaking, painting, and collage - and was considered a multimedia artist. The term "multimedia" as we know it today was borrowed from the art world and referred to any artist who used several media to create a single piece of art. Bearden created his collages by combining cut paper, paint, photographs, marker, pencil, and pen and ink. Although he created his layers manually by cutting, layering, and pasting different elements, you will able to emulate his methods in Adobe Photoshop by employing the software's different tools and working in layers.

Please look carefully at Bearden's work. Notice the way he used color, shape, photographs, and page layout to communicate his ideas and make statements about his world. The link below, Guided Tour, provides a short video description of his work, "The Block." Please watch the video and pay careful attention to the analysis of the work.

  1. What are your thoughts about the way Bearden combines photos, color, and shape in his multimedia pieces?
  2. How do you foresee using these ideas and practices in your own work?
  3. What do Bearden's images say about his world?
  4. How can an understanding of art inform the images you use in instructional design?
  5. Why do you think I am asking you to look at this artist's work?